From this, barring pure doublespeak, it is clear that he has changed his opinion, but also that as soon as the new opinion became publicly known, he felt he had to deny it.
I don't think it too cynical to deduct that Stefánsson was the object of a “friendly conversation” over the phone, or in a café, suggesting he quickly retract his critical comments about the anti-Covid vaccine otherwise he might face the loss of grant money for his research or perhaps find himself the object of an investigation leading, possibly, to no more paychecks... Such are the idle speculations that come to mind as a hypothesis explaining such behaviour...
Considering the ferocity against anyone who doubts the vaccine narrative, this looks very likely. Criticising the stuff may be even deadlier than the stuff itself :)
Stefánsson most likely received a visit or a phone call from one of his WEF/EU/NATO/WHO/DOD counterparts who read him the riot act. It's sort of like the Mafia, once you're in there's no way out except via a coffin.
I don't think it too cynical to deduct that Stefánsson was the object of a “friendly conversation” over the phone, or in a café, suggesting he quickly retract his critical comments about the anti-Covid vaccine otherwise he might face the loss of grant money for his research or perhaps find himself the object of an investigation leading, possibly, to no more paychecks... Such are the idle speculations that come to mind as a hypothesis explaining such behaviour...
Considering the ferocity against anyone who doubts the vaccine narrative, this looks very likely. Criticising the stuff may be even deadlier than the stuff itself :)
Stefánsson most likely received a visit or a phone call from one of his WEF/EU/NATO/WHO/DOD counterparts who read him the riot act. It's sort of like the Mafia, once you're in there's no way out except via a coffin.
Thanks for continuing to report.
Maybe he was worried that "Stefánsson did not kill himself" might have started trending on Twitter.