If 10% of serious cases are reported, one in every 380 Icelandic children aged 5-17 had serious adverse effects after vaccination against Covid-19. None have been hospitalized with the disease.
Even if serious adverse events have not been reported, this ignores the fact that we have no long-term safety data. Also we know that any ‘efficacy’ of these vaccines is minimal and lasts weeks at most. How could anyone imagine that one/two doses could achieve anything unless we are intending regular boosters of our kids (which is, no doubt, what they plan). I imagine anyone landing on earth from Mars would think that they had arrived on a planet of imbeciles as who would take the slightest risk with the health of their young for a medical product that neither stops infection nor transmission of what is - in the young - an extremely mild illness. Quite honestly there should never have been any debate on this issue as it should have been obvious to anyone with a functioning brain that this was a no-go area!
My problem with this is that ‘serious’ covers so much territory. While I do wish governments would carry out proper surveys to get a handle on this I can’t help feeling that the events most people would regard as ‘serious’ are likely reported at quite high rates. You aren’t going to keep quiet about eg tinnitus. Whether they deliberately exclude things saying they likely weren’t caused by the vaccine I don’t know. I have heard stories of such resistance.
This is quite complicated I think. On one hand you might expect people not keeping quiet, but on the other, you might expect them to do so, in order to avoid looking like "anti-vaxxers", who are the new "homines sacri" of our time. Historically the proportion of serious effects against all effects in Iceland is about the third of what it is in Norway and Sweden.
Even if serious adverse events have not been reported, this ignores the fact that we have no long-term safety data. Also we know that any ‘efficacy’ of these vaccines is minimal and lasts weeks at most. How could anyone imagine that one/two doses could achieve anything unless we are intending regular boosters of our kids (which is, no doubt, what they plan). I imagine anyone landing on earth from Mars would think that they had arrived on a planet of imbeciles as who would take the slightest risk with the health of their young for a medical product that neither stops infection nor transmission of what is - in the young - an extremely mild illness. Quite honestly there should never have been any debate on this issue as it should have been obvious to anyone with a functioning brain that this was a no-go area!
This is madness, I agree. Mattias Desmet has explained this very well.
Great information. Keep fighting the good fight. This is an absolutely revolting situation.
Thanks for the support.
My problem with this is that ‘serious’ covers so much territory. While I do wish governments would carry out proper surveys to get a handle on this I can’t help feeling that the events most people would regard as ‘serious’ are likely reported at quite high rates. You aren’t going to keep quiet about eg tinnitus. Whether they deliberately exclude things saying they likely weren’t caused by the vaccine I don’t know. I have heard stories of such resistance.
This is quite complicated I think. On one hand you might expect people not keeping quiet, but on the other, you might expect them to do so, in order to avoid looking like "anti-vaxxers", who are the new "homines sacri" of our time. Historically the proportion of serious effects against all effects in Iceland is about the third of what it is in Norway and Sweden.